4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from BABY TAM & CO., INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BABY TAM & CO., INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “a prior restraint exists when the enjoyment of protected expression is contingent upon the approval of government officials.” | 6 |
| 2 | Jack Carreras v. City Of Anaheim | green | “where the state constitutional provisions offer more expansive protection than the federal constitution, the court must address the state constitutional claims in order to avoid unnecessary consideration of the federal constitutional claims.” | 4 |
| 3 | Legislature v. Eu | green | “would have adopted the remaining provisions had they foreseen the success of plaintiffs' challenge.” | 3 |
| 4 | Gonzales v. Superior Court | green | “congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.