6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 121 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees Anchor | green | “the potential to affect the outcome of the suit under the applicable law.” | 29 |
| 2 | Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees | green | “potential to affect the outcome of the suit under the applicable law.” | 28 |
| 3 | Walsh v. Town of Lakeville | green | “if, after viewing the record in the non-moving party's favor, the court determines that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is appropriate.” | 24 |
| 4 | Galloza-Gonzalez v. Foy | green | “conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation.” | 19 |
| 5 | Vineberg v. Bissonnette | green | “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 14 |
| 6 | Sundance Cruises Corp. v. American Bureau of Shipping | green | “the nonmoving party 'may not rest upon mere allegation or denials of his pleading,” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.