3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ms. K Ex Rel. S.B. v. City of South Portland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ms. K Ex Rel. S.B. v. City of South Portland Anchor | green | “an iep is not a legally binding contract.” | 7 |
| 2 | Neosho R-V School District v. Clark | green | “fact that no cohesive plan was in place to meet the child's behavioral needs” | 5 |
| 3 | M.L., a Minor C.D., His Parent S.L., His Parent v. Federal Way School District Washington Superintendent of Public Instruction | green | “each public agency must ensure that . . . special education and related services are made available to the child in accordance with the child's iep.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.