3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. Reitz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. Reitz Anchor | green | “typically, a party manifests its assent by signing an agreement.” | 9 |
| 2 | In Re Bunzl USA, Inc. | green | “typically, a party manifests its assent by signing an agreement.” | 4 |
| 3 | Wayne Wright, Individually, and Wayne Wright, LLP, D/B/A Wayne Wright Injury Lawyers v. Erika v. Hernandez | green | “typically, a party manifests its assent by signing an agreement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.