3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bonetti v. Embarq Management Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonetti v. Embarq Management Co. Anchor | green | “if the parties are represented by competent counsel in an adversary context, the settlement they reach will, almost by definition, be reasonable.” | 10 |
| 2 | Candace Nall v. Mal-Motels, Inc. | green | “the purposes of the flsa are undermined whenever an employer is allowed to escape liability for violations of the statute” | 3 |
| 3 | Miles v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC. | green | “the reason judicial approval is required for flsa settlements is to ensure that a settlement of an flsa claim does not undermine the statute's terms or purposes” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.