4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re B.R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re B.R. Anchor | green | “the focus of a chins proceeding is the welfare of the child.” | 7 |
| 2 | In re D.D. | green | “when reviewing a chins decision, we uphold the court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and the court's legal conclusions when supported by those findings.” | 4 |
| 3 | E.J.R. v. Young | green | “actual and completed harmful acts cannot be, and are not, a precondition to a chins finding” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.