3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Gomez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Gomez Anchor | green | “a flawed federal analysis, structural differences between state and federal government, or distinctive state characteristics.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Sherry | green | “there is no constitutional right to allow the accused to confront witnesses against him at the preliminary hearing.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Gomez | green | “may diverge from federal precedent for three reasons: a flawed federal analysis, structural differences between state and federal government, or distinctive state characteristics.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.