5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from First Equity Federal, Inc. v. Phillips Development, LC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Equity Federal, Inc. v. Phillips Development, LC Anchor | green | “we look to the express language of that procedural rule and to the cases interpreting it.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Thompson | green | “a right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures of their bank statements,” | 3 |
| 3 | State Ex Rel. AR v. CR | green | “determination of whether the exclusionary rule applies depends upon the nature of the proceeding rather than the circumstances under which the evidence was collected.” | 3 |
| 4 | State Ex Rel. AR v. CR | green | “it is unnecessary to consider in this case whether the searches by police officers were unreasonable,” | 3 |
| 5 | State Ex Rel. Lm | green | “recite the facts in a light most favorable to the juvenile court findings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.