2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co. Anchor | green | “seeking removal has the burden to establish that removal is proper” | 13 |
| 2 | Gardiner Family, LLC v. Crimson Resource Management Corp. | green | “the question . . . becomes whether the plaintiffs' description of doe defendants or their activities is specific enough as to suggest their identity, citizenship, or relationship to the action.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.