4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Dunbar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Dunbar Anchor | green | “in most cases, challenges to the reimbursement order will be premature if the defendant has not been required to commence repayment” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Dunbar | green | “the court does need to provide some indication of consideration, such as noting that it reviewed the financial and employment sections of the defendant's presentence investigation report or, even more generally, a statement that it considered the defendant's ability to pay.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Albert | green | “james and fuller do not require a prior determination of ability to pay in a recoupment system which treats recoupment judgment debtors like other civil judgment debtors. . . .” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Dunbar | green | “in regard to defendant's opportunity to be heard, defendant was not prevented from objecting at sentencing and asserting his indigency.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.