4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from DEPT. OF CON. & IND. SVCS. v. Shah.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPT. OF CON. & IND. SVCS. v. Shah Anchor | green | “michigan courts typically consider corporations legally distinct from their shareholders, even if a single shareholder owns all the stock.” | 5 |
| 2 | Foodland Distributors v. Al-Naimi | green | “because of the equitable nature of the remedy.” | 4 |
| 3 | Glenn v. TPI Petroleum, Inc. | green | “(1) whether the corporation is undercapitalized, (2) whether separate books are kept, (3) whether there are separate finances for the corporation, (4) whether the corporation is used for fraud or illegality, (5) whether corporate formalities have been followed, and (6) whether t…” | 4 |
| 4 | Foodland Distributors v. Al-Naimi | green | “however, when this fiction is invoked to subvert justice, it may be ignored by the courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.