2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re KAD.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re KAD Anchor | green | “in reviewing a question of subject matter jurisdiction, our standard of review is de novo.” | 8 |
| 2 | In re K.A.D. | green | “in reviewing a question of subject matter jurisdiction, our standard of review is de novo.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.