4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Madison Ex Rel. M.M. v. Williamson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madison Ex Rel. M.M. v. Williamson Anchor | green | “without reference to any guiding rules or principles.” | 6 |
| 2 | McInnis v. Mallia | green | “pertinent date for this inquiry is the final date on which the no evidence motion is presented to the trial court for ruling.” | 4 |
| 3 | Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Fuqua | green | “after adequate time for discovery.” | 3 |
| 4 | McInnis v. Mallia | green | “our principal task is to determine if the record provides support for the trial court's consideration of a no evidence summary judgment motion” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.