5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robison v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robison v. State Anchor | green | “we fail to see where the policy decisions of our sister courts throughout the union are ever raised to the level of a due process right or a due course of law right.” | 4 |
| 2 | Zwack v. State | green | “not supported his contention with convincing argument.” | 3 |
| 3 | Zwack v. State | green | “the failure of the trial court to answer an inquiry from the jury as to the consequences” | 3 |
| 4 | Zwack v. State | green | “the rule announced by the district of columbia circuit court of appeals in lyles was not based upon constitutional principles but upon its rule-making authority.” | 3 |
| 5 | Earnhart v. State | green | “referral to the original charge is not considered an additional instruction” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.