4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rotenberry v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rotenberry v. State Anchor | green | “the act of removing from sight or notice; hiding.” | 7 |
| 2 | Hollingsworth v. State | green | “to hide or to keep from observation, discovery or understanding.” | 3 |
| 3 | Stewart v. State | green | “requires intent as to a particular result, namely, impairing a thing's availability as evidence” | 3 |
| 4 | Sanders v. State | green | “possible destruction of evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.