2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741 Anchor | green | “pretext is not established by virtue of the fact that an employee has received some favorable comments in some categories or has, in the past, received some good evaluations.” | 6 |
| 2 | Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc., Toys \R\" Us | green | “the question is not whether the employer made the best or even a sound business decision; it is whether the real reason is discrimination.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.