3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Kindem.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Kindem Anchor | green | “it would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Bertsch | green | “even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Bertsch | green | “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.