3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martens v. MCL Construction Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martens v. MCL Construction Corp. Anchor | green | “view all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences from the facts presented in favor of the nonmovant.” | 6 |
| 2 | Alternate Fuels, Inc. v. Director of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | green | “the agency's failure to respond to a written response submitted within 30 days shall be deemed an acceptance by the agency of the proposed compliance commitment agreement for the violations alleged in the written noticed issued as contained within the written response.” | 5 |
| 3 | Zenith Vending Corp. v. Village of Schaumburg | green | “adjudicating the contested rights in a conclusive and definitive manner.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.