3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp. Anchor | green | “the purpose of the adequate representation requirement is to ensure that all class members will receive proper, efficient, and appropriate protection of their interests in the presentation of the claim.” | 8 |
| 2 | Clark v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. | green | “individual questions of injury and damages do not defeat class certification.” | 4 |
| 3 | Clark v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. | green | “the class action (1) can best secure the economies of time, effort, and expense and promote a uniformity of decision or (2) can accomplish the other ends of equity and justice that class actions seek to obtain.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.