2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vasquez v. Residential Investments, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vasquez v. Residential Investments, Inc. Anchor | green | “the existence of a legal duty to use reasonable care in a particular factual situation is a question of law for the court to decide.” | 11 |
| 2 | Mendoza v. City of Los Angeles | green | “the elements of a cause of action for negligence are (1) a legal duty to use reasonable care, (2) breach of that duty, and (3) proximate or legal cause between the breach and (4) the plaintiffs injury.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.