2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc. Anchor | green | “is designed to maintain the conceptual distinction between breach of contract claims and tort claims by precluding plaintiffs from recasting ordinary breach of contract claims into tort claims.” | 10 |
| 2 | Williams v. Hilton Group PLC | green | “calls for a fact-intensive judgment as to the true nature of a claim.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.