5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Vincenty.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Vincenty Anchor | green | “illustrates that suspects cannot knowingly and intelligently determine whether to waive their right against self-incrimination if, when making that determination, they have not been informed of the charges filed against them.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Reginald Roach (068874) | green | “in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him . . . .” | 3 |
| 3 | Raymond Gibbs v. Patrick Covello | green | “is a close one, and if we were answering that question de novo, we might” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Cabbell | green | “a witness is effectively absent from trial and does not 'appear' for cross- examination if he invokes his fifth amendment privilege in response to every question.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Vincenty | green | “there is no ambiguity as to the essential nature and gradation of the charge(s) the defendant is facing because the specific offense(s) for which a judge found probable cause are set forth in the charging document.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.