3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dratewska-Zator v. Rutherford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dratewska-Zator v. Rutherford Anchor | neutral | “are considered part of the pleading for every purpose.” | 7 |
| 2 | Ranjha v. BJBP Properties, Inc. | green | “mere conclusions of law or facts unsupported by specific factual allegations in a complaint are insufficient to withstand a section 2-615 motion to dismiss.” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Perez | green | “primary objective is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent, keeping in mind that the best and most reliable indicator of that intent is the statutory language itself, given its plain and ordinary meaning.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.