3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Patterson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Patterson Anchor | green | “whether sufficient evidence exists to support the verdict is a question of law; thus, our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary.” | 7 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Kearney | green | “whether viewing all the evidence admitted at trial in the light most favorable to the commonwealth, there is sufficient evidence to enable the fact-finder to find every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Haynes | green | “the evidence need not preclude every possibility of innocence and the fact-finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.