5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roll v. Gavitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roll v. Gavitt Anchor | green | “contain the requisite objective medical findings that raise issues of fact whether plaintiff sustained a serious injury” | 4 |
| 2 | BURKE, LUCILLE M. v. MORAN, RYAN D. | green | “was unable to perform substantially all of the material acts that constituted his usual and customary daily activities during the requisite period of time” | 3 |
| 3 | Montgomery v. Daniels | green | “failed to produce any evidence in admissible form which supports such a claim” | 3 |
| 4 | Stivers v. Brownell | green | “there is a conflict between an order and a decision,” | 3 |
| 5 | Schreiber v. Krehbiel | green | “were not curtailed to a great extent' and that he therefore did not sustain a serious injury under the 90/180-day category of serious injury” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.