3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mike Smith v. Alda Jean Found.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Smith v. Alda Jean Found Anchor | green | “on appeal from the grant or denial of summary judgment, we conduct a de novo review, with all reasonable inferences construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 10 |
| 2 | Crabapple Lake Parc Community Ass'n v. Circeo | green | “if the manifest intent of the parties can be ascertained from the covenants as a whole, no ambiguity exists, and there is no need for judicial construction.” | 3 |
| 3 | S-D Rira, LLC v. Outback Property Owners' Ass'n | green | “if the manifest intent of the parties can be ascertained from the covenants as a whole, no ambiguity exists, and there is no need for judicial construction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.