3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Peña Fuentes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Peña Fuentes Anchor | green | “a 'defendant's double jeopardy rights are violated if he or she is convicted of offenses that are identical both in fact and in law.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Mutch | green | “each count must be based on a separate and distinct criminal act.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Mutch | green | “manifestly apparent to the jury that the state was not seeking to impose multiple punishments for the same offense' and that each count was based on a separate act.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.