5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Hansen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Hansen Anchor | green | “determine what the law covers.” | 4 |
| 2 | NetChoice, LLC v. Attorney General, State of Florida | green | “unless posts and users are removed randomly, those sorts of actions necessarily convey some sort of message-most ob- viously, the platforms' disagreement with . . . certain content” | 3 |
| 3 | NetChoice, LLC v. Attorney General, State of Florida | green | “whether, to what extent, and in what manner to dissemi- nate third-party created content to the public” | 3 |
| 4 | NetChoice v. Paxton | green | “protecting a diversity of ideas.” | 3 |
| 5 | Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer | green | “to have standing, a plaintiff must assert a violation of his own rights” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.