3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rains v. Rains.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rains v. Rains Anchor | green | “an abuse of discretion is found only in extreme cases in which the result is so palpably and grossly violative of fact and logic that it evidences a perversity of will or the exercise of passion or bias.” | 8 |
| 2 | Rains v. Rains | green | “this court reviews a trial court's decision regarding a motion for change of domicile for an abuse of discretion and a trial court's findings regarding the factors set forth in mcl 722.31(4) under the 'great weight of the evidence' standard.” | 5 |
| 3 | McKimmy v. Melling | green | “the new visitation plan only need provide a realistic opportunity to preserve and foster the parental relationship previously enjoyed by the nonrelocating parent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.