4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hood v. Amarillo National Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hood v. Amarillo National Bank Anchor | green | “a summary judgment which does not dispose of all parties and issues in the pending suit is interlocutory and not appealable unless a severance is ordered.” | 6 |
| 2 | City of Alton v. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. | green | “a primary (and, at the very least, a third-party) beneficiary of the guarantee,” | 3 |
| 3 | Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co. | green | “granting texas treasure leave to cure the defect in its verified denial would have been patently prejudicial to christus by depriving it of the presumptive validity of (and immediate recovery on) its suit on sworn account and by requiring it to litigate the merits of that claim …” | 3 |
| 4 | Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Waiters | green | “in admiralty, if a defendant believes that amounts actually expended for maintenance and cure are unreasonable, he may offer rebuttal proof.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.