3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Thomas J. Licata.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Thomas J. Licata Anchor | green | “the exigencies must be viewed from the totality of circumstances known to the officers at the time of the warrantless intrusion.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Lefkowitz | green | “the informed and deliberate determinations of magistrates empowered to issue warrants as to what searches and seizures are permissible under the constitution are to be preferred over the hurried action of officers and others who may happen to make arrests.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Thomas J. Licata | green | “exigencies must be viewed from the totality of circumstances known to the officers at the time of the warrantless intrusion.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.