5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc. Anchor | green | “absent a clear conflict with the federal maritime law,” | 3 |
| 2 | Earl E. Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc. | green | “the duty to provide maintenance and cure is in no real sense contractual, and a suit for failure to provide maintenance or cure can hardly be equated, therefore, with an action for breach of contract,” | 3 |
| 3 | Joseph D'amato v. Wisconsin Gas Company | green | “that the two responsible agencies were not to work at cross purposes or to duplicate each other's efforts” | 3 |
| 4 | Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines | green | “a delicate accommodation of federal and state interests,” | 3 |
| 5 | Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines | green | “one of the essential and longstanding features of substantive admiralty law is that contributory negligence can be considered only in mitigation of damages.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.