4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Republican Party of Minnesota v. White.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Republican Party of Minnesota v. White Anchor | green | “guarantees a party that the judge who hears his case will apply the law to him in the same way he applies it to any other party.” | 5 |
| 2 | Republican Party of Minnesota v. White | green | “recusal is the least restrictive means of accomplishing the state's interest in impartiality articulated as a lack of bias for or against parties to the case.” | 4 |
| 3 | Republican Party of Minnesota v. White | green | “himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” | 3 |
| 4 | Republican Party of Minnesota v. White | green | “the constitutional guarantee of the freedom of speech has its fullest and most urgent application precisely to the conduct of campaigns for political office.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.