3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from C & W Fish Company, Inc. v. William W. Fox, Jr., Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C & W Fish Company, Inc. v. William W. Fox, Jr., Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Anchor | green | “task is not to review de novo whether the amendment complies with these standards but to determine whether the secretary's conclusion that the standards have been satisfied is rational and supported by the record.” | 7 |
| 2 | C & W Fish Company, Inc. v. William W. Fox, Jr., Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | green | “rational and supported by the record.” | 5 |
| 3 | Nat Resrc Def Cncl v. Daley, William M. | green | “it is only when two different plans achieve similar conservation measures that the service takes into consideration adverse economic consequences.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.