2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clarence Enochs v. Lampasas County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarence Enochs v. Lampasas County Anchor | green | “(1) whether the state claims raise novel or complex issues of state law; (2) whether the state claims substantially predominate over the federal claims; (3) whether the federal claims have been dismissed; and (4) whether there are exceptional circumstances or other compelling re…” | 11 |
| 2 | C. Richard Brown and Karen Brown v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, James G. Bryan, and Keith Dendy | green | “when there is a subsequent narrowing of the issues such that the federal claims are eliminated and only pendent state claims remain, federal jurisdiction is not extinguished, and the decision as to whether to retain the pendent claims lies within the sound discretion of the dist…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.