5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in Interest.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in Interest Anchor | green | “where the question of basic liability in antitrust cases can be established readily by common issues, then it is apparent that the case is appropriate for class action under rule 23(b)(3).” | 3 |
| 2 | Davis v. Avco Financial Services | green | “despite the fact that as the case developed individual questions became more prominent vis a vis common questions of law and fact, there still were and are significant common questions such that we would not be justified in decertifying the class at this late date.” | 3 |
| 3 | Smalley & Company v. Emerson & Cuming, Inc. | green | “prohibits contracts and conspiracies that restrain trade.” | 3 |
| 4 | Medcom Holding Company, Cross-Appellee v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. And Medtrain, Inc. | green | “run the exact numbers and calculations of a damages model with 'mathematical certainty.” | 3 |
| 5 | Tuf Racing Products, Inc. v. American Suzuki Motor Corporation | green | “the jury awarded only a bit more than 10 percent of that” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.