2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Margaret Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Margaret Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Company Anchor | green | “rule 702 makes inadmissible expert testimony as to a matter which obviously is within the common knowledge of jurors because such testimony, almost by definition, can be of no assistance.” | 12 |
| 2 | United States v. Douglas Fred Dorsey | green | “is something that can sufficiently be done by the jury without help from an expert.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.