3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Van Den Bosch v. Raemisch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Den Bosch v. Raemisch Anchor | green | “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” | 8 |
| 2 | Arzel Haley v. Boniface Gross, Lieutenant McKee and Michael Ellis | green | “can be inferred by the trier of fact from the obviousness of the risk.” | 4 |
| 3 | Gary Orlowski v. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin | green | “approach the qualified-immunity inquiry by treating as true the evidence-supported facts and inferences favoring” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.