4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sonntag v. Shaw.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sonntag v. Shaw Anchor | green | “rejected the proposition that there can exist no individual liability under the nmhra.” | 5 |
| 2 | Charles James Witt v. Roadway Express, Jim Kasperski, Teamsters Local No. 41, and Warren Stevens | green | “pervasiveness and severity are independent and equal grounds” | 4 |
| 3 | Marjorie A. CREAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., Defendant-Appellee | green | “a discriminatory and abusive environment must affect the employee's work environment so substantially as to make it intolerable for her to continue.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lobato v. New Mexico Environment Department | green | “because we conclude that lobato has no title vii claim, we also conclude he has no nmhra claim” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.