2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs Service Anchor | green | “individuals have an obvious privacy interest cognizable under exemption 7(c) in keeping secret the fact that they were subjects of a law enforcement investigation.” | 10 |
| 2 | Beltranena v. Clinton | green | “controverted by either contrary evidence in the record or by evidence of agency bad faith.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.