3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leadville Coal Co. v. McCreery.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leadville Coal Co. v. McCreery Anchor | green | “e cannot fail to observe that the main scope and purpose of this appeal seem to be to relitigate questions fully determined by the final decree appealed from and affirmed.” | 4 |
| 2 | Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation | green | “rule 62(d) of the federal rules of civil procedure allows an appellant to obtain an automatic stay of execution of judgment pending appeal by posting a bond.” | 3 |
| 3 | Enrique Diaz v. Dennis Shallbetter | green | “amendments may or may not govern 'further proceedings' in pending cases," but the "just and practicable" standard and the rules enabling act "say only that new acts in cases already on the docket ordinarily should conform to the new rules” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.