5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 601 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Santiago v. Warminster Township.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santiago v. Warminster Township Anchor | green | “where there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement for relief.” | 221 |
| 2 | Morse v. Lower Merion School District | green | “need not credit a complaint's bald assertions or legal conclusions when deciding a motion to dismiss.” | 139 |
| 3 | Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters | green | “assume that a . . . plaintiff can prove facts that the . . . plaintiff has not alleged.” | 118 |
| 4 | Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc. | green | “stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of 'entitlement of relief.” | 69 |
| 5 | Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | green | “although a district court may not consider matters extraneous to the pleadings, a document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint may be considered without converting the motion to dismiss in one for summary judgment” | 54 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.