2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Maples v. Jimmy Stegall.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Maples v. Jimmy Stegall Anchor | green | “where, as here, the state court did not assess the merits of a claim properly raised in a habeas petition, the deference due under aedpa does not apply.” | 9 |
| 2 | Jerry McMeans v. Anthony J. Brigano, Warden,respondent-Appellee | green | “(1) reliance upon federal cases employing constitutional analysis; (2) reliance upon state cases employing federal constitutional analysis; (3) phrasing the claim in terms of constitutional law or in terms sufficiently particular to allege a denial of a specific constitutional r…” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.