Topic: a necessary corollary to the final 27 judgment rule is that… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #26313

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Ironworks & Erectors Inc. v. North American Construction Corporation.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 American Ironworks & Erectors Inc. v. North American Construction Corporation Anchor
ca9 · 2001
green “a necessary corollary to the final 27 judgment rule is that a party may appeal interlocutory orders after entry of final judgment because those orders merge into that 28 final judgment.” 3
2 Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)
bap9 · 2006
green “whether the 26 underlying arbitration followed basic elements of adjudicatory 27 procedure and was, thus, 'adjudicatory in nature.” 3
3 Suarez v. Barrett (In Re Suarez)
bap9 · 2009
green “arising from the tort causes of action, and 15 perjury of fri/kaplan.” 3
4 Nein v. HostPro, Inc.
calctapp · 2009
green “against one who did not actually appear in the prior 27 action . . . where the unsuccessful party in the first action might fairly be treated as acting in a representative capacity for 28 a nonparty” 3
5 Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'n
calctapp · 1998
green “due process requires that the nonparty have had an 12 identity or community of interest with, and adequate representation by, the . . . party in the first action. 13 the circumstances must also have been such that the nonparty should reasonably have expected to be bound by 14 th…” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check