2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Anchor | green | “congress wanted section 5 to have the full effect that its comprehensive phraseology implies.” | 5 |
| 2 | Kernan v. American Dredging Co. | green | “it is clear that the general congressional intent was to provide liberal recovery for injured workers” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.