5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Aneta Lumaj v. Alberto R. Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aneta Lumaj v. Alberto R. Gonzales Anchor | green | “was not detained, imprisoned, tortured, or sexually assaulted in any way.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kaba v. Mukasey | green | “under this deferential standard, we may not reverse the boards's or the immigration judge's determination simply because we would have decided the matter differently.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mohammed v. Keisler | green | “was the victim of past persecution.” | 3 |
| 4 | Gjokic v. Ashcroft | green | “was not detained, imprisoned, tortured, or sexually assaulted in any way.” | 3 |
| 5 | Gjokic v. Ashcroft | green | “while even a single beating offends one's sense of civilized governmental conduct, a single beating does not compel a finding of persecution.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.