3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bishop.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bishop Anchor | green | “reasonable suspicion must be based on specific, articulable facts and the rational inferences that can be drawn from those facts.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Phillip James Morgan | green | “limited investigatory detentions are permissible when justified by an officer's reasonable articulable suspicion that a person has committed, or is about to commit, a crime.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Ferreira | green | “inchoate and unparticularized suspicion” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.