2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Estate of Ardell Hamilton Trigg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Estate of Ardell Hamilton Trigg Anchor | green | “subject matter jurisdiction relates to a court's authority to adjudicate a particular type of case or controversy brought before it.” | 11 |
| 2 | Liberty Synergistics Inc. v. Microflo Ltd. | green | “the point of the anti-slapp statute is that you have a right not to be dragged through the courts because you exercised your constitutional rights.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.