3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joseph E. Hancock v. Easwaran P. Variyam.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph E. Hancock v. Easwaran P. Variyam Anchor | green | “defamation is generally defined as the invasion of a person's interest in her reputation and good name.” | 7 |
| 2 | Mary Louise Serafine v. Alexander Blunt and Ashley Blunt | green | “clear and specific evidence' refers to the quality of evidence required to establish a prima facie case, while the term 'prima facie case' refers to the amount of evidence required to satisfy the nonmovant's minimal factual burden.” | 5 |
| 3 | Wylie Cavin Lillian Cavin And Eagle Radiology, PLLC v. Kristin Abbott and William Abbott | green | “collectively, these elements require that a party 'provide enough detail to show the factual basis for its claim,' and thus effectively abrogate the utility of mere notice pleading as 'evidence' to that end.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.