2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Appeal of Lunde.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Appeal of Lunde Anchor | green | “generally, we do not construe a statute in a way that renders a significant part of it pure surplusage.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Therrien, Jr. | green | “the interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.